Direct Payment Program in Florence County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,026
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Florence County, South Carolina totaled $13,341,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | S Aaron Godwin II | Lake City, SC 29560 | $153,528 |
22 | Kelley Farms Partnership | Olanta, SC 29114 | $150,691 |
23 | F & D Farms - 2009 | Lake City, SC 29560 | $140,387 |
24 | Shirley Ann Floyd | Lake City, SC 29560 | $134,545 |
25 | David H Chandler | Cades, SC 29518 | $128,975 |
26 | Brooklyn Poston | Johnsonville, SC 29555 | $124,973 |
27 | Dry Creek Farms Inc | Pamplico, SC 29583 | $124,409 |
28 | Daniel P Gause | Scranton, SC 29591 | $121,835 |
29 | Roger D Poston | Johnsonville, SC 29555 | $117,310 |
30 | F & D Farms | Lake City, SC 29560 | $114,931 |
31 | E S Willis III | Florence, SC 29503 | $114,151 |
32 | Floyd Farms Of Florence Inc | Florence, SC 29501 | $111,480 |
33 | Swink Farms | Effingham, SC 29541 | $105,460 |
34 | D R Singletary | Pamplico, SC 29583 | $105,075 |
35 | Kinsey Jones | Johnsonville, SC 29555 | $103,355 |
36 | James M Ward | Timmonsville, SC 29161 | $101,565 |
37 | Heath Matthews | Coward, SC 29530 | $101,251 |
38 | C Kelly Windham | Lamar, SC 29069 | $93,741 |
39 | Terry V Poston | Johnsonville, SC 29555 | $93,130 |
40 | David L Hanna | Lake City, SC 29560 | $89,947 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”