Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Florence County, South Carolina, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 23
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Florence County, South Carolina totaled $61,100 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Arbor One Aca ** | Florence, SC 29502 | $16,181 |
2 | Patrick E Burch | Lake City, SC 29560 | $15,696 |
3 | Dry Creek Farms Inc | Pamplico, SC 29583 | $6,772 |
4 | , | $4,814 | |
5 | David Farmer | Florence, SC 29501 | $3,482 |
6 | , | $3,370 | |
7 | Mack Arthur Beard III | Lake City, SC 29560 | $1,821 |
8 | John Wallace Thomas | Lake City, SC 29560 | $1,122 |
9 | Ronald D Friday Dba Candy Friday Farms | Blythewood, SC 29016 | $1,029 |
10 | Conner Wade Poston | Pamplico, SC 29583 | $1,014 |
11 | Robert Burgess | Lake City, SC 29560 | $854 |
12 | Harry Brown Sr | Johnsonville, SC 29555 | $839 |
13 | Roscher Stuckey | Johnsonville, SC 29555 | $719 |
14 | Bobby Ray Floyd III | Lake City, SC 29560 | $636 |
15 | Robbie L Springs | Lake City, SC 29560 | $542 |
16 | Tharrington Harris | Scranton, SC 29591 | $517 |
17 | Ray Stuckey Jr | Johnsonville, SC 29555 | $507 |
18 | Cindi Knight | Scranton, SC 29591 | $494 |
19 | Roger Stuckey | Johnsonville, SC 29555 | $252 |
20 | Dennis Myers | Effingham, SC 29541 | $186 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>