Counter Cyclical Program in Jasper County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 81
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Jasper County, South Carolina totaled $238,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ginn Farms | Varnville, SC 29944 | $49,336 |
2 | Harold H Wall Sr | Ridgeland, SC 29936 | $18,894 |
3 | Larry R Deloach | Estill, SC 29918 | $18,103 |
4 | Wayne O Deloach | Estill, SC 29918 | $18,103 |
5 | Lonnie M Ginn Farms LLC | Varnville, SC 29944 | $11,886 |
6 | Good Hope Corporation | Ridgeland, SC 29936 | $10,273 |
7 | L H Youmans Jr Robert A Youmans Sr | Furman, SC 29921 | $9,686 |
8 | James E Lee | Garnett, SC 29922 | $9,482 |
9 | Maurice E Crosby | Early Branch, SC 29916 | $8,564 |
10 | Cypress Woods Corp | Ridgeland, SC 29936 | $6,932 |
11 | Cypress Creek | Bluffton, SC 29910 | $6,857 |
12 | Estate Of Von L Ginn | Varnville, SC 29944 | $5,274 |
13 | F A Nimmer Jr | Ridgeland, SC 29936 | $5,045 |
14 | Davant Farming & Timber Co Inc | Ridgeland, SC 29936 | $4,837 |
15 | S C Forestry Commission | Wedgefield, SC 29168 | $4,620 |
16 | Chelsea Agricultural Inc | Ridgeland, SC 29936 | $4,116 |
17 | Euhaw Creek Plantation Inc | Ridgeland, SC 29936 | $3,721 |
18 | Trust U/w John Morel | Savannah, GA 31412 | $2,493 |
19 | Richard R Schulze | Tillman, SC 29943 | $2,450 |
20 | Sarah B Morgan | Ridgeland, SC 29936 | $2,371 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>