Farm Subsidy information
Kershaw County, South Carolina
Total Subsidies in Kershaw County, South Carolina, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 94
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kershaw County, South Carolina totaled $2,413,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Chaplin Brothers Farms LLC | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $10,448 |
22 | Palmetto Land & Timber Of Camden LLC | Lugoff, SC 29078 | $10,257 |
23 | Kenneth Dan Mckittrick Jr | Heath Springs, SC 29058 | $10,246 |
24 | Wind In The Willows Nursery Inc. | Bethune, SC 29009 | $9,291 |
25 | Larry V Johnson | Camden, SC 29020 | $7,872 |
26 | Vincent D Smith | Bethune, SC 29009 | $7,232 |
27 | Scottie Reynolds | Kershaw, SC 29067 | $6,939 |
28 | Roy M Gaskins | Bethune, SC 29009 | $6,573 |
29 | Kenneth Brent Williams | Heath Springs, SC 29058 | $6,556 |
30 | Tracy L Bush | Heath Springs, SC 29058 | $6,481 |
31 | William G Tolbert Jr | Bethune, SC 29009 | $6,400 |
32 | Ellen Mclaurin | Surfside Beach, SC 29587 | $6,275 |
33 | Jean Francois Truesdale | Camden, SC 29020 | $5,953 |
34 | Gary Sowell | Kershaw, SC 29067 | $5,291 |
35 | Lynnwood H Horton | Bethune, SC 29009 | $5,250 |
36 | Windy Hill Farm LLC | Bethune, SC 29009 | $5,024 |
37 | Corey Gardner | Kershaw, SC 29067 | $4,977 |
38 | Robert E Goodwin | Columbia, SC 29223 | $4,807 |
39 | Danny L Marsh | Camden, SC 29020 | $4,738 |
40 | Lawrence E Slade | Camden, SC 29021 | $4,731 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”