Farm Subsidy information
Kershaw County, South Carolina
Total Subsidies in Kershaw County, South Carolina, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 24
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kershaw County, South Carolina totaled $402,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Palmetto Land & Timber Of Camden LLC | Lugoff, SC 29078 | $10,258 |
2 | Thomas E Davis | Bethune, SC 29009 | $4,099 |
3 | Rodney Eugene Barringer | Camden, SC 29020 | $4,026 |
4 | Palmer Farms J7 LLC | Ridgeway, SC 29130 | $2,063 |
5 | C Marion Yarbrough | Cassatt, SC 29032 | $1,668 |
6 | Wind In The Willows Nursery Inc. | Bethune, SC 29009 | $1,394 |
7 | , | $1,176 | |
8 | William E Lindler | Rembert, SC 29128 | $1,062 |
9 | Christopher Glen Chick | Kershaw, SC 29067 | $809 |
10 | Fb Hines Jr Family Limited Partne | Columbia, SC 29205 | $774 |
11 | Aimee G Mcelveen | Camden, SC 29020 | $483 |
12 | Robert E Goodwin | Columbia, SC 29223 | $404 |
13 | , | $338 | |
14 | Kevin T Rickard | Sumter, SC 29154 | $273 |
15 | Cathy V Taylor | Kershaw, SC 29067 | $264 |
16 | James R Belton | Cassatt, SC 29032 | $231 |
17 | Ralph And Lavaughn Mccaskill Family Trust | Bethune, SC 29009 | $210 |
18 | Evelyn P Watkins | Easley, SC 29642 | $207 |
19 | Sheila W Bracey | Lugoff, SC 29078 | $202 |
20 | John Seebach | Lancaster, SC 29720 | $165 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>