Farm Subsidy information
Kershaw County, South Carolina
Total Subsidies in Kershaw County, South Carolina, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 678
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kershaw County, South Carolina totaled $16,727,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | C Marion Yarbrough | Cassatt, SC 29032 | $114,453 |
22 | Jack R Corbett | Camden, SC 29020 | $112,949 |
23 | Ryan Bowers | Lugoff, SC 29078 | $105,758 |
24 | Mulberry Resources Inc | Camden, SC 29020 | $105,574 |
25 | W Baynard Boykin | Rembert, SC 29128 | $105,265 |
26 | Sc Dept Of Corrections Agricultur | Rembert, SC 29128 | $102,808 |
27 | Harold V Horton | Bethune, SC 29009 | $101,758 |
28 | Holton Farms Inc | Bethune, SC 29009 | $99,377 |
29 | Double L Farms Partnership | Rembert, SC 29128 | $96,121 |
30 | Billy Howe Farms | Marion, SC 29571 | $94,529 |
31 | Donald H Horton | Bethune, SC 29009 | $94,108 |
32 | Willie Mae J West | Cayce, SC 29033 | $88,699 |
33 | Richard W Knight | Bethune, SC 29009 | $87,679 |
34 | William E Lindler | Rembert, SC 29128 | $86,960 |
35 | William G Tolbert Jr | Bethune, SC 29009 | $82,437 |
36 | Palmer Farms J7 LLC | Ridgeway, SC 29130 | $81,809 |
37 | Fb Hines Jr Family Limited Partne | Columbia, SC 29205 | $75,915 |
38 | Chaplin Brothers Farms LLC | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $72,108 |
39 | Lavaughn D Mccaskill | Bethune, SC 29009 | $71,225 |
40 | Neil Smith | Bethune, SC 29009 | $69,683 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”