Conservation Reserve Program in Lancaster County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 201
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Lancaster County, South Carolina totaled $1,350,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Garrett J Mobley | Kershaw, SC 29067 | $8,166 |
42 | J B Floyd | Kershaw, SC 29067 | $7,946 |
43 | John Talmadge Bailey Jr | Lancaster, SC 29720 | $7,854 |
44 | James I Starnes Jr | Heath Springs, SC 29058 | $7,841 |
45 | J M Bridges Jr | Heath Springs, SC 29058 | $7,833 |
46 | Charles A Byrd | West Columbia, SC 29170 | $7,476 |
47 | Annie T Croxton | Kershaw, SC 29067 | $7,374 |
48 | Charley S Robertson Est | Columbia, SC 29209 | $7,182 |
49 | Jessie M Blackmon Est | Lancaster, SC 29720 | $7,035 |
50 | Dorothy D Massey | Lancaster, SC 29720 | $7,014 |
51 | Randy B Massey | Lancaster, SC 29720 | $7,014 |
52 | Joseph Scott Croxton | Kershaw, SC 29067 | $6,864 |
53 | Dorothy Marshall Mcdowell | Lancaster, SC 29720 | $6,840 |
54 | Sara M Gardner | Orangeburg, SC 29116 | $6,734 |
55 | Cecil E Horton | Heath Springs, SC 29058 | $6,720 |
56 | M F Catoe | Heath Springs, SC 29058 | $6,225 |
57 | Gonze Lee Twitty | Heath Springs, SC 29058 | $6,156 |
58 | Cathy H Hucks | Heath Springs, SC 29058 | $6,087 |
59 | Luenette D Langley Estate | Lancaster, SC 29720 | $6,063 |
60 | Eugenia W Graham | Lancaster, SC 29720 | $6,048 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”