Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Laurens County, South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 134
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Laurens County, South Carolina totaled $198,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Don Rackley | Clinton, SC 29325 | $2,639 |
22 | Billy R Abercrombie | Gray Court, SC 29645 | $2,627 |
23 | Walter Tim Caldwell | Enoree, SC 29335 | $2,229 |
24 | Ray Whiteford | Clinton, SC 29325 | $2,162 |
25 | J Michael Johnson Sr | Kinards, SC 29355 | $1,909 |
26 | Christopher Patton | Fountain Inn, SC 29644 | $1,821 |
27 | Harry Duane Johnson | Simpsonville, SC 29681 | $1,719 |
28 | Nelson Crisp | Cross Hill, SC 29332 | $1,672 |
29 | Pat Hunter Jr | Gray Court, SC 29645 | $1,648 |
30 | Jerry Wayne Darby | Gray Court, SC 29645 | $1,633 |
31 | Bruce A Marshall | Clinton, SC 29325 | $1,626 |
32 | Ray Stoddard | Gray Court, SC 29645 | $1,608 |
33 | Stumpy Hill Farm, LLC | Woodruff, SC 29388 | $1,571 |
34 | Doug W Stewart | Fountain Inn, SC 29644 | $1,557 |
35 | Nathan Wood | Ware Shoals, SC 29692 | $1,482 |
36 | Ronald Barnes Jr | Laurens, SC 29360 | $1,430 |
37 | O Perry Earle III | Fountain Inn, SC 29644 | $1,404 |
38 | Kenneth E Sprouse | Laurens, SC 29360 | $1,379 |
39 | William Lewis Croxton | Gray Court, SC 29645 | $1,360 |
40 | James M Addy | Laurens, SC 29360 | $1,331 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”