Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments in Lee County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 62
Recipients of Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments from farms in Lee County, South Carolina totaled $2,049,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ronnie Brand | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $24,380 |
22 | Beasley Farms Inc | Mayesville, SC 29104 | $23,112 |
23 | Robert C Mccutchen III | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $23,063 |
24 | Jason Mcfaddin Gamble | New Zion, SC 29111 | $22,719 |
25 | C E Clanton Jr | Bishopville, SC 29010 | $21,305 |
26 | Victoria S Elmore | Dalzell, SC 29040 | $20,301 |
27 | Ashwood Gin Inc | Mayesville, SC 29104 | $19,826 |
28 | Robert E Moore III Farms LLC | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $19,772 |
29 | Pondville Farms | Bishopville, SC 29010 | $17,100 |
30 | Dubose Family Farm III LLC | Lamar, SC 29069 | $16,074 |
31 | Marvin Wayne Mozingo | Bishopville, SC 29010 | $14,760 |
32 | Stevenson Carl Gamble Jr | New Zion, SC 29111 | $14,120 |
33 | Billy Benton | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $13,659 |
34 | Davis A White Jr | Bishopville, SC 29010 | $12,507 |
35 | Agriservices Inc Of The Pee Dee | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $11,862 |
36 | Eugene A Jackson | Sumter, SC 29153 | $11,710 |
37 | J-ray Farms Of South Carolina General Partnership | Mayesville, SC 29104 | $11,370 |
38 | David Holland | Bishopville, SC 29010 | $10,534 |
39 | Caughman And Son Farms LLC | Sumter, SC 29153 | $10,190 |
40 | Welsh Farms LLC | Bishopville, SC 29010 | $9,761 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”