Farm Subsidy information
Lee County, South Carolina
Total Subsidies in Lee County, South Carolina, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 178
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lee County, South Carolina totaled $8,858,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | James F Bland III | Mayesville, SC 29104 | $5,014 |
62 | Creechwood LLC | Sumter, SC 29150 | $4,887 |
63 | Victor C Mcleod Jr | Camden, SC 29020 | $4,876 |
64 | Joe Atkinson III | Bishopville, SC 29010 | $4,595 |
65 | Frank A Mcleod III | Columbia, SC 29205 | $4,580 |
66 | G W Tisdale | Manning, SC 29102 | $4,326 |
67 | Annette C Tiller | Mayesville, SC 29104 | $4,224 |
68 | Gonzales' Land & Timber LLC | Columbia, SC 29201 | $3,736 |
69 | Irvin Fortune | Mayesville, SC 29104 | $3,727 |
70 | Gwen G Jones | Sumter, SC 29153 | $3,514 |
71 | , | $3,465 | |
72 | Wesley Hopkins | Bishopville, SC 29010 | $3,373 |
73 | F B F Realty LLC | Glassboro, NJ 08028 | $3,180 |
74 | Kurt C Wagner | Bishopville, SC 29010 | $3,100 |
75 | Hugh E Redick Profit Sharing Plan | Bishopville, SC 29010 | $3,007 |
76 | John D Brunson III | Sumter, SC 29153 | $2,885 |
77 | , | $2,883 | |
78 | Brian Holland | Darlington, SC 29532 | $2,861 |
79 | Margaret Bland Cooper | Manning, SC 29102 | $2,854 |
80 | Nancy V Bland | Savannah, GA 31419 | $2,854 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”