Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Marion County, South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 47
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Marion County, South Carolina totaled $103,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Seagroves Family Farms LLC | Myrtle Beach, SC 29578 | $1,193 |
22 | Nathaniel Hughes Jr | Marion, SC 29571 | $971 |
23 | Pressly Hughes | Marion, SC 29571 | $971 |
24 | Michel K Larimore | Gresham, SC 29546 | $929 |
25 | Thad A Williams | Brittons Neck, SC 29546 | $928 |
26 | Neil Rouse | Fork, SC 29543 | $916 |
27 | Javier Sandoval Diaz | Loris, SC 29569 | $748 |
28 | Jordan Farms LLC | Marion, SC 29571 | $745 |
29 | Ronald D Cribb | Gresham, SC 29546 | $682 |
30 | Victor Carmichael | Mullins, SC 29574 | $513 |
31 | Jack M Jordan Jr | Loris, SC 29569 | $490 |
32 | Herbert Timmons | Mullins, SC 29574 | $367 |
33 | J Wes Daniels | Mullins, SC 29574 | $363 |
34 | Chadwick Austin Page | Mullins, SC 29574 | $353 |
35 | Christopher S Brigman | Latta, SC 29565 | $345 |
36 | Randy Pridgen | Marion, SC 29571 | $336 |
37 | Jacky R Gerrald Jr | Mullins, SC 29574 | $330 |
38 | Gary L Dozier | Marion, SC 29571 | $327 |
39 | Heyward C Sauls | Mullins, SC 29574 | $306 |
40 | James David Jordan | Marion, SC 29571 | $287 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”