Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Marion County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 96
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Marion County, South Carolina totaled $1,765,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Al Mcintyre | Marion, SC 29571 | $6,641 |
42 | Tony Collins | Mullins, SC 29574 | $6,600 |
43 | Christopher S Brigman | Latta, SC 29565 | $6,374 |
44 | William D Atkinson III | Mullins, SC 29574 | $6,122 |
45 | J Roth Snowden | Marion, SC 29571 | $5,032 |
46 | Jack M Jordan Jr | Loris, SC 29569 | $4,950 |
47 | Milton Edward Baxley III | Mullins, SC 29574 | $4,924 |
48 | Phillip B Martin | Marion, SC 29571 | $4,785 |
49 | Lawton Shane Drew | Mullins, SC 29574 | $3,442 |
50 | Joseph Brian Wallace | Mullins, SC 29574 | $3,135 |
51 | Michel K Larimore | Gresham, SC 29546 | $2,815 |
52 | Edsel L Williams | Brittons Neck, SC 29546 | $2,805 |
53 | Neil Rouse | Fork, SC 29543 | $2,750 |
54 | Billy W Coleman | Mullins, SC 29574 | $2,695 |
55 | James F Huggins Jr | Mullins, SC 29574 | $2,640 |
56 | Pressly Hughes | Marion, SC 29571 | $2,530 |
57 | John Paul Williams III | Marion, SC 29571 | $2,530 |
58 | Ray Faulk | Mullins, SC 29574 | $2,528 |
59 | J P Willilams | Marion, SC 29571 | $2,420 |
60 | James Douglas Hughes | Marion, SC 29571 | $2,024 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”