Total Commodity Programs in Marlboro County, South Carolina, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 67
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Marlboro County, South Carolina totaled $272,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Calhoun Farms | Clio, SC 29525 | $44,418 |
2 | Frank & Cheryle Rogers | Blenheim, SC 29516 | $30,036 |
3 | First Citizens Bank ** | Mc Coll, SC 29570 | $27,630 |
4 | William C Covington Jr | Clio, SC 29525 | $21,264 |
5 | Rhett Covington Farms | Mc Coll, SC 29570 | $19,254 |
6 | Pat And Blake Rogers Farms | Blenheim, SC 29516 | $16,978 |
7 | Spring Hills Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $9,324 |
8 | John Mcinnis Farms Inc | Clio, SC 29525 | $8,149 |
9 | Douglas H & Margaret H Newton | Clio, SC 29525 | $8,106 |
10 | Arbor One Aca ** | Florence, SC 29502 | $8,024 |
11 | Alan Gray Burroughs | Blenheim, SC 29516 | $7,195 |
12 | William Andrew Burroughs Jr | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $6,774 |
13 | J Allan Mcdonald Farms | Tatum, SC 29594 | $6,758 |
14 | T G Gibson Farms | Gibson, NC 28343 | $6,682 |
15 | Charles M Rogers | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $5,081 |
16 | Miriam C Lee | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $4,387 |
17 | William Andrew Burroughs | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $3,944 |
18 | Brightsville Cotton Co | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $3,892 |
19 | Richard & Jane Rogers Farm | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $3,518 |
20 | M & F Pegues LLC | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $3,379 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>