Farm Subsidy information

Marlboro County, South Carolina

Total Subsidies in Marlboro County, South Carolina, 2019

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 134

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Marlboro County, South Carolina totaled $6,898,000 in in 2019.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
2019
1Calhoun FarmsClio, SC 29525$455,525
2Arbor One Aca **Florence, SC 29502$381,052
3Rhett Covington FarmsMc Coll, SC 29570$373,397
4Frank & Cheryle RogersBlenheim, SC 29516$315,050
5Alan Gray BurroughsBennettsville, SC 29512$301,283
6Pat And Blake Rogers FarmsBlenheim, SC 29516$284,492
7J Allan Mcdonald FarmsTatum, SC 29594$256,992
8Oneal Planting CoBlenheim, SC 29516$193,145
9Richard & Jane Rogers FarmBennettsville, SC 29512$168,904
10William C Covington JrClio, SC 29525$161,854
11Douglas H & Margaret H NewtonClio, SC 29525$142,834
12Jmh Farms LLCBennettsville, SC 29512$123,022
13William Andrew BurroughsBennettsville, SC 29512$119,261
14Marlboro Tobacco Farms LLCBennettsville, SC 29512$106,082
15Baucom Family Farm General PartnershipMonroe, NC 28110$105,078
16William Andrew Burroughs JrBennettsville, SC 29512$101,645
17Joshua D OtuelBennettsville, SC 29512$100,880
18The Promise Land Stillwell FarmsMc Coll, SC 29570$98,563
19E Duncan AyersBennettsville, SC 29512$94,314
20First Citizens Bank **Mc Coll, SC 29570$88,468

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag