Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Oconee County, South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 128
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Oconee County, South Carolina totaled $174,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Michael C King | Westminster, SC 29693 | $1,313 |
42 | John S Shirley Sr | Seneca, SC 29678 | $1,308 |
43 | David Michael Oliver | West Union, SC 29696 | $1,291 |
44 | Timothy D Donald | Fair Play, SC 29643 | $1,281 |
45 | Seth Waldroup | Westminster, SC 29693 | $1,224 |
46 | Thee Cornerstone Farm LLC | Westminster, SC 29693 | $1,222 |
47 | Ricky Cummings | Walhalla, SC 29691 | $1,217 |
48 | Joseph Michael Johnson | Seneca, SC 29678 | $1,213 |
49 | Timothy C Swain | Fair Play, SC 29643 | $1,174 |
50 | Matthew W Mclane | Westminster, SC 29693 | $1,159 |
51 | Raymond Loudermilk | Walhalla, SC 29691 | $1,141 |
52 | William Mark Holbrooks | Seneca, SC 29678 | $1,134 |
53 | James H Myers Jr | Westminster, SC 29693 | $1,129 |
54 | James H Morris Sr | Seneca, SC 29678 | $1,107 |
55 | Roger Michael Head | Fair Play, SC 29643 | $1,091 |
56 | James Harold Reid Jr | Walhalla, SC 29691 | $1,081 |
57 | Justin Tyler Ables | Westminster, SC 29693 | $1,058 |
58 | Donald R Fowler | West Union, SC 29696 | $1,032 |
59 | John M Powell | West Union, SC 29696 | $1,023 |
60 | Sammy Kaye Owen | Seneca, SC 29678 | $947 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”