Cotton Ginning Program in Orangeburg County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 104
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in Orangeburg County, South Carolina totaled $1,950,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Russell Farms Part | Holly Hill, SC 29059 | $30,044 |
22 | James L Fanning Jr | Neeses, SC 29107 | $28,887 |
23 | Tampa Creek Farms LLC | North, SC 29112 | $28,834 |
24 | Rhine Russell Hoffman | Swansea, SC 29160 | $28,480 |
25 | Harry & Thad Wimberly Dba Wimco | Bowman, SC 29018 | $27,270 |
26 | Seven Oaks Farm | North, SC 29112 | $26,452 |
27 | Tommy M Stillinger | Neeses, SC 29107 | $24,310 |
28 | Circle W Farm | Bowman, SC 29018 | $23,834 |
29 | Tracy C Sanders Jr | Springfield, SC 29146 | $23,566 |
30 | Ronald W Weathers | Branchville, SC 29432 | $21,355 |
31 | James H Bookhart | Elloree, SC 29047 | $20,930 |
32 | H Briggs Salley Jr | Salley, SC 29137 | $20,890 |
33 | H E & J B Shuler & Sons | Holly Hill, SC 29059 | $20,674 |
34 | Robert Michael Furtick Jr | Neeses, SC 29107 | $20,399 |
35 | Walker Bros. Farm, LLC | Norway, SC 29113 | $19,829 |
36 | Garrick Farms Inc | Cope, SC 29038 | $18,950 |
37 | Morgan's Farm | Springfield, SC 29146 | $17,834 |
38 | Bear Spring Farms Inc | Orangeburg, SC 29118 | $15,450 |
39 | Funchess Brothers Farms | Rowesville, SC 29133 | $14,804 |
40 | Glenn Barr | Norway, SC 29113 | $14,778 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”