Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Orangeburg County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 161
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Orangeburg County, South Carolina totaled $1,218,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Richard D Fogle | Neeses, SC 29107 | $6,325 |
62 | Wesley H Shuler | Columbia, SC 29205 | $6,315 |
63 | Ted C Shuler & Sons Inc | Santee, SC 29142 | $5,990 |
64 | Bear Spring Farms Inc | Orangeburg, SC 29118 | $5,920 |
65 | Tampa Creek Farms LLC | North, SC 29112 | $5,910 |
66 | Joe C & Wallace E Haigler | Cameron, SC 29030 | $5,897 |
67 | Larry Allen Davis | Neeses, SC 29107 | $5,604 |
68 | John Hayne Culler Jr | Orangeburg, SC 29118 | $5,421 |
69 | Bryan Dantzler Farms LLC | Santee, SC 29142 | $5,028 |
70 | Tommy Clark Stillinger | Neeses, SC 29107 | $4,473 |
71 | Tony R Rucker | Pelion, SC 29123 | $4,372 |
72 | Jdc Joint Venture | Orangeburg, SC 29116 | $4,161 |
73 | C & W Land Holdings LLC | Cope, SC 29038 | $4,107 |
74 | William J Bair | Bowman, SC 29018 | $4,046 |
75 | George H Garrick Jr | Cope, SC 29038 | $4,036 |
76 | James L Fanning Jr | Neeses, SC 29107 | $3,782 |
77 | Christopher Stephen Bishop | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $3,683 |
78 | M J Holstein | North, SC 29112 | $3,641 |
79 | G Laverne Williams Jr | Norway, SC 29113 | $3,511 |
80 | Braxton B Williams III | Norway, SC 29113 | $3,511 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”