Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Orangeburg County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 161
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Orangeburg County, South Carolina totaled $1,218,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cotton Lane Farms | Elloree, SC 29047 | $70,257 |
2 | Jjj Farms | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $58,245 |
3 | Gregg Covington Farms Partnership | Norway, SC 29113 | $54,751 |
4 | Hutto Brothers Partnership | Holly Hill, SC 29059 | $35,281 |
5 | Riley Farms | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $31,310 |
6 | Kirby Brown & Sons | Springfield, SC 29146 | $29,593 |
7 | Ted Shuler & Sons | Santee, SC 29142 | $28,215 |
8 | Strock Farms Partnership | Elloree, SC 29047 | $27,146 |
9 | Russell Farms Part | Holly Hill, SC 29059 | $25,655 |
10 | Funchess Brothers Farms | Rowesville, SC 29133 | $24,787 |
11 | Traywick And Son Farm | Cope, SC 29038 | $24,760 |
12 | Alva W Dannelly Jr | Norway, SC 29113 | $24,726 |
13 | Roy M Hungerpiller III | Cameron, SC 29030 | $24,539 |
14 | Gunter Farms | Reevesville, SC 29471 | $24,438 |
15 | H Briggs Salley Jr | Salley, SC 29137 | $23,112 |
16 | Edward M Rast Jr | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $23,015 |
17 | Haigler Farms Partnership | Cameron, SC 29030 | $22,677 |
18 | Leeta B Holman | Cameron, SC 29030 | $21,366 |
19 | Ott Farms LLC | Elloree, SC 29047 | $20,825 |
20 | Nottoc Farm | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $18,965 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>