Farm Subsidy information
Richland County, South Carolina
Total Subsidies in Richland County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 261
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Richland County, South Carolina totaled $30,852,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Bruces Greenhouses Inc. | Blythewood, SC 29016 | $65,141 |
42 | Collier C Taylor | Columbia, SC 29204 | $65,121 |
43 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $64,677 |
44 | Mary H Anderson | Hopkins, SC 29061 | $64,096 |
45 | John H Rudisill | Hopkins, SC 29061 | $62,030 |
46 | Willie H Sharpe Jr | Eastover, SC 29044 | $60,179 |
47 | Two Rivers Farm LLC | Columbia, SC 29211 | $57,387 |
48 | Jacqueline A Griffin | Columbia, SC 29209 | $55,079 |
49 | Samuel Clarkson | Hopkins, SC 29061 | $53,405 |
50 | Nat J Love | Columbia, SC 29202 | $52,987 |
51 | Patsy Daniels | Columbia, SC 29223 | $51,494 |
52 | Brett Hipp | Irmo, SC 29063 | $51,323 |
53 | Joseph Spells Jr | Columbia, SC 29203 | $48,290 |
54 | Toms Creek Family Farms, LLC | Columbia, SC 29201 | $47,230 |
55 | Broadleah Farms LLC | Columbia, SC 29205 | $37,722 |
56 | Zack C Clarkson Jr | Hopkins, SC 29061 | $37,620 |
57 | Broadleah Farms LLC | Columbia, SC 29205 | $37,434 |
58 | Woodard Vale Inc | Eastover, SC 29044 | $35,784 |
59 | Harriet Burnside | Hopkins, SC 29061 | $35,600 |
60 | Patsy Daniels-adams | Hopkins, SC 29061 | $35,175 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”