Farm Subsidy information
Richland County, South Carolina
Total Subsidies in Richland County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 261
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Richland County, South Carolina totaled $30,852,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | John Champey | Hopkins, SC 29061 | $5,566 |
122 | Philip Rivers | Hopkins, SC 29061 | $5,259 |
123 | Edward Sims | Gadsden, SC 29052 | $5,094 |
124 | Doctor David Sims | Hopkins, SC 29061 | $4,986 |
125 | Estate Of Cornell Adams | Eastover, SC 29044 | $4,965 |
126 | James P Neal Jr | Columbia, SC 29204 | $4,600 |
127 | Willie Lakin | Hopkins, SC 29061 | $4,461 |
128 | Mallie R Addison Jr | Gadsden, SC 29052 | $4,425 |
129 | Robert B Walker Jr | Columbia, SC 29205 | $4,413 |
130 | Cyrus Weston | Eastover, SC 29044 | $4,233 |
131 | Robert B Dorn Jr | Irmo, SC 29063 | $3,893 |
132 | Walter Campbell | Lugoff, SC 29078 | $3,856 |
133 | Melvin T Harrill | Chapin, SC 29036 | $3,746 |
134 | Feeder Lot Farm | Columbia, SC 29211 | $3,714 |
135 | Ed Catalano | Columbia, SC 29203 | $3,628 |
136 | Cleveland Sims | Gadsden, SC 29052 | $3,505 |
137 | Margaret Goodwin | Columbia, SC 29203 | $3,375 |
138 | Tally Adams Jr | Eastover, SC 29044 | $3,268 |
139 | W Patrick Dorn Jr | Winnsboro, SC 29180 | $3,216 |
140 | Edwin L Pearson Jr | Hopkins, SC 29061 | $3,083 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”