Farm Subsidy information
Williamsburg County, South Carolina
Total Subsidies in Williamsburg County, South Carolina, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 273
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Williamsburg County, South Carolina totaled $10,923,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Seaboard Farms LLC | Andrews, SC 29510 | $62,190 |
22 | Lawrence Steve Godwin | Lake City, SC 29560 | $53,895 |
23 | Cornelius D Cooper | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $53,613 |
24 | Marti Louise Easler | Greeleyville, SC 29056 | $52,975 |
25 | Chris Springs | Lake City, SC 29560 | $51,531 |
26 | Pete Farms LLC | Hemingway, SC 29554 | $46,629 |
27 | , | $46,145 | |
28 | Milton R Parrott | Cades, SC 29518 | $45,580 |
29 | Lucius L Rogers Jr | Nesmith, SC 29580 | $45,463 |
30 | Charles Boyd Cantley Jr | Andrews, SC 29510 | $39,484 |
31 | Wardell Bluefort Jr | Nesmith, SC 29580 | $39,452 |
32 | Grier Farms LLC | Hemingway, SC 29554 | $38,919 |
33 | Carl L Cantey Jr | Salters, SC 29590 | $36,064 |
34 | Howard O Mcclam | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $35,503 |
35 | Indiantown Farms Inc | Hemingway, SC 29554 | $35,212 |
36 | J R Lawrimore Farms | Hemingway, SC 29554 | $33,783 |
37 | Jimmie Phillips | Lake City, SC 29560 | $29,906 |
38 | Kevin Lyn Gowdy | Cades, SC 29518 | $28,464 |
39 | David B Floyd | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $28,062 |
40 | Harry L. Dukes | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $25,826 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”