Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Williamsburg County, South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 133
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Williamsburg County, South Carolina totaled $1,242,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Seaboard Farms LLC | Andrews, SC 29510 | $9,658 |
42 | Lucius L Rogers Jr | Nesmith, SC 29580 | $9,351 |
43 | Mcclam Irrigated | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $9,293 |
44 | David B Floyd | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $8,922 |
45 | Harry L Carter Jr | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $8,876 |
46 | William A Carsten | Cades, SC 29518 | $8,839 |
47 | Shane W Stuckey | Hemingway, SC 29554 | $8,740 |
48 | Marie W Brown | Nesmith, SC 29580 | $8,704 |
49 | Richard Gordon Scott | Salters, SC 29590 | $8,436 |
50 | John L Floyd | Lake City, SC 29560 | $8,281 |
51 | Carl L Cantey Jr | Salters, SC 29590 | $8,113 |
52 | Jimmie Phillips | Lake City, SC 29560 | $8,030 |
53 | Tremain Bluefort | Nesmith, SC 29580 | $7,929 |
54 | Bryant Bluefort | Nesmith, SC 29580 | $7,598 |
55 | Ondra Rodgers Hanna | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $7,461 |
56 | Cs Farms | Hemingway, SC 29554 | $6,938 |
57 | Jerry Kevin Mouzon | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $6,363 |
58 | Robert Emerson Watts | Cades, SC 29518 | $6,188 |
59 | Kevin Lyn Gowdy | Cades, SC 29518 | $6,033 |
60 | Lawrence Steve Godwin | Lake City, SC 29560 | $5,951 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”