Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Williamsburg County, South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 133
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Williamsburg County, South Carolina totaled $1,242,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | William Kenneth Johnson Jr | Salters, SC 29590 | $1,527 |
102 | Gwendolyn Scott Bryant | Nesmith, SC 29580 | $1,447 |
103 | Edward Wilson | Hemingway, SC 29554 | $1,432 |
104 | Barrineau Brothers Farms | Lake City, SC 29560 | $1,405 |
105 | James Alton Morris Jr | Andrews, SC 29510 | $1,383 |
106 | Arthur C Tisdale | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $1,332 |
107 | James D Johnson Sr | Salters, SC 29590 | $1,323 |
108 | William Lee Roy Morris | Andrews, SC 29510 | $1,321 |
109 | James C Evans | Georgetown, SC 29440 | $1,307 |
110 | Cameron J Scott | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $1,298 |
111 | Joshua M Kellahan | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $1,210 |
112 | Abraham Mcfadden | Greeleyville, SC 29056 | $1,204 |
113 | Wayne Curtiss Johnson | Manning, SC 29102 | $1,178 |
114 | J Wayne Floyd | Lake City, SC 29560 | $1,153 |
115 | Millwood Land Company LLC | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $1,101 |
116 | Kent Koyit Pressley | Nesmith, SC 29580 | $1,056 |
117 | Wayne E Mccutchen | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $971 |
118 | David A Nexsen | Cades, SC 29518 | $909 |
119 | Mark E Daniels | Lake City, SC 29560 | $883 |
120 | Maceo E Scott Sr | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $870 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”