Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Williamsburg County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 156
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Williamsburg County, South Carolina totaled $5,345,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | James C Evans | Georgetown, SC 29440 | $4,116 |
122 | Charles K Brown | Lane, SC 29564 | $4,006 |
123 | Allen Carsten | Cades, SC 29518 | $3,983 |
124 | Mark E Daniels | Lake City, SC 29560 | $3,917 |
125 | Rhodas Mccutchen | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $3,698 |
126 | Tanglewood Limited Partnership | Sanibel, FL 33957 | $3,600 |
127 | Mary M Pressley | Nesmith, SC 29580 | $3,585 |
128 | Gwendolyn Scott Bryant | Nesmith, SC 29580 | $3,557 |
129 | Bark Landing Hunting Club, Inc. | Andrews, SC 29510 | $3,468 |
130 | Arthur C Tisdale | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $3,247 |
131 | Wayne Curtiss Johnson | Manning, SC 29102 | $3,205 |
132 | Byrdic Tisdale | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $3,063 |
133 | Alton E Brown III | Cades, SC 29518 | $3,053 |
134 | Kent Koyit Pressley | Nesmith, SC 29580 | $2,999 |
135 | Maceo E Scott Sr | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $2,860 |
136 | Thelbert A. Cooper | Lake City, SC 29560 | $2,612 |
137 | Professor Conyers | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $2,560 |
138 | Cameron J Scott | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $2,225 |
139 | J Wayne Floyd | Lake City, SC 29560 | $2,219 |
140 | Joe Eldridge Pressley Jr | Florence, SC 29505 | $2,022 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”