Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Williamsburg County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 59
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Williamsburg County, South Carolina totaled $153,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | John S Mcgill III | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $13,687 |
2 | Carsten Farms Inc | Cades, SC 29518 | $13,351 |
3 | Rabon Mckenzie | Andrews, SC 29510 | $11,052 |
4 | Ondra Rodgers Hanna | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $8,427 |
5 | Joe Brice Williamson Jr | Lake City, SC 29560 | $8,370 |
6 | James Alton Morris Jr | Andrews, SC 29510 | $8,234 |
7 | Walker D Morris | Andrews, SC 29510 | $7,974 |
8 | Bobby Rhem Cumbie Jr | Andrews, SC 29510 | $5,426 |
9 | Erma Jean T Brown | New Zion, SC 29111 | $4,569 |
10 | Alton E Brown Jr | Cades, SC 29518 | $3,931 |
11 | M C Casselman | Andrews, SC 29510 | $3,783 |
12 | Elliott Farms LLC | Andrews, SC 29510 | $3,669 |
13 | John Carson Willocks | Hemingway, SC 29554 | $3,635 |
14 | Robert J Morris | Andrews, SC 29510 | $3,264 |
15 | A V Thompson | Lake City, SC 29560 | $3,046 |
16 | Gordon Kenneth Morris III | Andrews, SC 29510 | $2,816 |
17 | Branson Arthur Tisdale Jr | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $2,765 |
18 | Robert D Baker | Cades, SC 29518 | $2,705 |
19 | Ernest W Prosser Iv | Lake City, SC 29560 | $2,664 |
20 | Charles Russell Smith | Lake City, SC 29560 | $2,592 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>