Total Commodity Programs in York County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 581
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in York County, South Carolina totaled $12,438,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | 7 Brooks Farms Inc | Hickory Grove, SC 29717 | $17,797 |
82 | Edith W Price | Rock Hill, SC 29732 | $17,692 |
83 | Rocky Ridge Farm Inc Of Sc | Sharon, SC 29742 | $17,498 |
84 | Walter E Bolin II | Clover, SC 29710 | $17,356 |
85 | Mcgill Brothers | Clover, SC 29710 | $17,211 |
86 | Martin Moses | Clover, SC 29710 | $17,202 |
87 | Walter Neal | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $16,865 |
88 | Keith E Hawkins | Hickory Grove, SC 29717 | $16,785 |
89 | H John Harshaw Jr | Mc Connells, SC 29726 | $16,590 |
90 | Jack L Roach | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $16,095 |
91 | John E Durai | Camden, SC 29020 | $15,935 |
92 | Williams Forest Products | Rock Hill, SC 29731 | $15,862 |
93 | John M Aycock Jr | Rock Hill, SC 29732 | $15,525 |
94 | Elmer F Biggers Dba Faulkner&biggers | Blacksburg, SC 29702 | $15,385 |
95 | Carl E Mauney Est | Clover, SC 29710 | $15,227 |
96 | Amelia H Simmers | Rock Hill, SC 29730 | $15,098 |
97 | Robert H Clawson | Mc Connells, SC 29726 | $14,978 |
98 | Brett Dye | Clover, SC 29710 | $14,836 |
99 | Garland T Davidson Jr | Clover, SC 29710 | $14,639 |
100 | United House Of Prayer | Charlotte, NC 28269 | $14,477 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”