Grasslands Reserve Program in South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 68
Recipients of Grasslands Reserve Program from farms in South Dakota totaled $478,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Grasslands Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lois Hall Land Limited Partnership | Midland, SD 57552 | $81,555 |
2 | Scott Pazour | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $43,372 |
3 | Mortenson Family Land Ltd | Hayes, SD 57537 | $25,996 |
4 | Clinton L Caldwell | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $20,023 |
5 | Philip Carley | Milesville, SD 57553 | $17,837 |
6 | Jeffery Jon Jessop | Presho, SD 57568 | $14,240 |
7 | Goebel Farms LLC | Lebanon, SD 57455 | $13,528 |
8 | Porter Nuttall Trust Udt June 29, 2010-admin Trust | Agar, SD 57520 | $13,437 |
9 | Dale H Robinson | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $12,690 |
10 | Doranna D Schmitz-garrity | Hayes, SD 57537 | $12,540 |
11 | Mark A Schaunaman | Ashley, ND 58413 | $12,394 |
12 | Larue Moak | Selby, SD 57472 | $11,942 |
13 | Kevin J Kallas | Leola, SD 57456 | $11,396 |
14 | Charles E Nold | Onaka, SD 57466 | $11,030 |
15 | Robert D Bosworth Revocable Living Trust | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $10,397 |
16 | Stroschein Family Limited Partnership | Mansfield, SD 57460 | $10,324 |
17 | Jestin Jack Schilling | Selby, SD 57472 | $9,497 |
18 | David L Phinney | Ree Heights, SD 57371 | $8,536 |
19 | Cheyenne Grazing Inc | Pierre, SD 57501 | $8,391 |
20 | Wayne A Lutz | Eureka, SD 57437 | $7,638 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>