Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 4,108
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in South Dakota totaled $15,373,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Vogel & Sautner Farms | Hoven, SD 57450 | $41,067 |
22 | P Spear Ranch Inc | Ree Heights, SD 57371 | $41,032 |
23 | Tim & Diane Olson Partnership | Hayes, SD 57537 | $40,521 |
24 | Danny And Mary Clark Farms Inc | Howard, SD 57349 | $39,953 |
25 | Gko Partnership | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $39,275 |
26 | David And Julie Clark Farms Inc | Howard, SD 57349 | $39,111 |
27 | Dao Farms Inc | Forestburg, SD 57314 | $38,825 |
28 | S & S Farms | Harrold, SD 57536 | $37,907 |
29 | Bolton Ranch LLC | Dallas, SD 57529 | $37,355 |
30 | Needles View Ranch LLC | Fairburn, SD 57738 | $34,733 |
31 | Schwarting Brothers Partnership | Gordon, NE 69343 | $34,630 |
32 | Swenson Partnership | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $33,772 |
33 | Debra A Ahlers | Flandreau, SD 57028 | $32,578 |
34 | Colby Lacompte | Winner, SD 57580 | $32,509 |
35 | S & A Frericks Inc | Ashton, SD 57424 | $32,169 |
36 | J & L Maher Inc | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $32,105 |
37 | Hoffman Harvesting Inc | Bowdle, SD 57428 | $32,090 |
38 | T J Farms Partnership | Pierre, SD 57501 | $32,058 |
39 | Piotter Family Farms Inc | New Effington, SD 57255 | $32,001 |
40 | Natasha Marie Zubke | Milbank, SD 57252 | $31,324 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”