Conservation Reserve Program in South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 14,103
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in South Dakota totaled $131,826,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lazy Tv Ranch | Selby, SD 57472 | $79,047 |
22 | Dave Dawson | Howard, SD 57349 | $78,601 |
23 | Het Loo Farms LLC | Harrisburg, SD 57032 | $77,320 |
24 | Gross Properties | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $76,325 |
25 | Alvine Family Limited Partnership | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $76,280 |
26 | Lyle Schaunaman | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $75,255 |
27 | Hand Bros Ptr | Midland, SD 57552 | $74,727 |
28 | Culhane Properties Inc | Midland, SD 57552 | $74,372 |
29 | Bonaire Partnership | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $73,540 |
30 | B & B Livestock | Letcher, SD 57359 | $73,370 |
31 | Randy Brodersen | Wolsey, SD 57384 | $72,315 |
32 | Bonnie Siebrecht Robinson Trust 2017 | Redfield, SD 57469 | $70,455 |
33 | , | $70,114 | |
34 | Lazy Diamond M Ranch | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $69,283 |
35 | Cobb Cattle Co | Red Owl, SD 57787 | $66,936 |
36 | J&j Schaunaman Partnership | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $66,607 |
37 | Jacob J Linn | Elm Springs, SD 57791 | $66,162 |
38 | Benjamin R Linn | Elm Springs, SD 57791 | $66,162 |
39 | Bixler Farms | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $65,652 |
40 | Michael Weaver | Carthage, SD 57323 | $65,216 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”