Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in South Dakota, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 27,049

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in South Dakota totaled $823,180,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
61Millerdale Hutterian Brethren IncMiller, SD 57362$609,352
62Propork, LLCFaulkton, SD 57438$605,698
63Fordham Hutterian Brethren IncCarpenter, SD 57322$600,756
64Bornitz FarmsCarthage, SD 57323$596,063
65Poinsett Hutterian Brethren IncEstelline, SD 57234$594,455
66P J Werdel & Sons IncRee Heights, SD 57371$594,450
67Premier Beef ManagementSioux Falls, SD 57105$590,785
68Jes Farms PartnershipPierre, SD 57501$582,363
69Collins Hutterian Brethren IncIroquois, SD 57353$580,657
70Thunderbird Hutterian Brethren, IncWecota, SD 57438$550,187
71Pleasant Valley ColonyFlandreau, SD 57028$543,491
72Hutterville South Dakota IncStratford, SD 57474$542,418
73Red Willow Hutterian Brethren, Inc.White, SD 57276$537,200
74Schlechter FarmsOrient, SD 57467$533,711
75Lubbers Farm IncGregory, SD 57533$533,280
76Tschetter Huterian Brethern IncOlivet, SD 57052$531,497
77CuzPlatte, SD 57369$524,702
78Westwood Hutterian Brethren IncBritton, SD 57430$519,714
79Blooming Valley Grain Farms IncWatertown, SD 57201$514,778
80Spring Lake ColonyArlington, SD 57212$511,039

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag