Farm Subsidy information
South Dakota
Total Subsidies in South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 36,090
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in South Dakota totaled $1,280,000,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Mary Kaye Gesinger | Eagle Butte, SD 57625 | $309,715 |
62 | Chane Coomes | Manderson, SD 57756 | $308,278 |
63 | Prairie River Farm Inc | Watertown, SD 57201 | $304,885 |
64 | Larson Livestock | Columbia, SD 57433 | $304,677 |
65 | Rosenfeld Hutterian Brethren Inc | Forbes, ND 58439 | $303,735 |
66 | Fast View Farms | Huron, SD 57350 | $303,504 |
67 | Kyle Gross | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $302,996 |
68 | Rockport Hutterian Brethren Inc | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $302,344 |
69 | Pazour Family Feeders | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $301,876 |
70 | Veal Black Angus Ranch | Meadow, SD 57644 | $296,365 |
71 | Donald L Palmer | Prairie City, SD 57649 | $296,182 |
72 | Schlechter Farms | Orient, SD 57467 | $295,595 |
73 | Roe Farms Jtv | Harrold, SD 57536 | $292,557 |
74 | Wade & Michelle Jones Partnership | Harrold, SD 57536 | $291,608 |
75 | Ramsey &ramsey | Philip, SD 57567 | $291,518 |
76 | Goose Lake Farms LLC | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $290,431 |
77 | Gary L Wickersham | Onida, SD 57564 | $288,519 |
78 | Scot D Eisenbraun | Wall, SD 57790 | $287,024 |
79 | Debora Ann Pfeifer | Mc Laughlin, SD 57642 | $286,156 |
80 | Kirk A Aughenbaugh | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $286,047 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”