Conservation Reserve Program in South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 13,755
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in South Dakota totaled $102,576,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Angela K Gross | Blunt, SD 57522 | $50,000 |
62 | Marty Norman | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $50,000 |
63 | Jenene L Opitz | Roslyn, SD 57261 | $50,000 |
64 | Jerry Patterson | Kadoka, SD 57543 | $50,000 |
65 | Dean N Schumacher | Eureka, SD 57437 | $50,000 |
66 | Madonna Grismer-bosch | Strasburg, ND 58573 | $50,000 |
67 | Murphy Family Trust | Sioux Falls, SD 57105 | $50,000 |
68 | Robert Winter | Volga, SD 57071 | $50,000 |
69 | April Wheat Patterson | Kadoka, SD 57543 | $50,000 |
70 | Irene M Rans | Huron, SD 57350 | $50,000 |
71 | Colton L Mcdaniel | Philip, SD 57567 | $50,000 |
72 | J Diamond T Inc | Selby, SD 57472 | $50,000 |
73 | Sunset Hutterian Brethren Inc | Britton, SD 57430 | $50,000 |
74 | Wade Parsons | Milesville, SD 57553 | $50,000 |
75 | Dakota Land Partners LLC | Cabool, MO 65689 | $50,000 |
76 | Sandy Lane Hutterian Brethren Inc | Britton, SD 57430 | $50,000 |
77 | Houchin Farms | Kennebec, SD 57544 | $50,000 |
78 | Anderson Bros Farms LLC | Turton, SD 57477 | $50,000 |
79 | Mcelroy Enterprises LLC | Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | $50,000 |
80 | Lieber Land Holdings LLC | Dakota Dunes, SD 57049 | $50,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”