Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 11,613
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in South Dakota totaled $105,358,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Thomas A Simons | Howes, SD 57748 | $95,976 |
62 | Tennant Ranch Inc | Camp Crook, SD 57724 | $94,974 |
63 | Taylor Snook | Hulett, WY 82720 | $94,843 |
64 | Knippling Hereford LLC | Gann Valley, SD 57341 | $94,683 |
65 | Jon L Millar | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $94,374 |
66 | Cheryl K Burghduff | Camp Crook, SD 57724 | $94,294 |
67 | Clay Schaack | Wall, SD 57790 | $93,167 |
68 | Daniel S Long | Waynesboro, PA 17268 | $92,838 |
69 | Seven Cross Ranch Inc | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $92,314 |
70 | Huffman Cattle Co Inc | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $89,322 |
71 | Gilbert Cattle Company | Ludlow, SD 57755 | $88,168 |
72 | Lcl Ranch Inc | Murdo, SD 57559 | $88,056 |
73 | Fishhook Ranch Inc | Prairie City, SD 57649 | $87,959 |
74 | K Lazy K Ranch Inc | Highmore, SD 57345 | $87,552 |
75 | Rodney L Larsen | Kimball, SD 57355 | $86,445 |
76 | Gotfredson Elm Creek Ranch | Newell, SD 57760 | $86,423 |
77 | Daniel A Valburg | White River, SD 57579 | $86,254 |
78 | Kathleen Ellsworth | Fort Thompson, SD 57339 | $85,981 |
79 | Reimann Ranch LLC | Miller, SD 57362 | $85,637 |
80 | Scot D Eisenbraun | Wall, SD 57790 | $83,763 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”