Production Flexibility Program in South Dakota, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 48,637

Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in South Dakota totaled $1,015,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Production Flexibility Program
1995-2023
61Riverside Hutterian Brethren IncHuron, SD 57350$295,356
62Elkhorn Farm IncMartin, SD 57551$295,273
63Spink Hutterian IncFrankfort, SD 57440$293,603
64Nelson Brothers PartnershipMiller, SD 57362$290,412
65Poinsett Hutterian Brethren IncEstelline, SD 57234$290,244
66Pearl Creek ColonyIroquois, SD 57353$288,239
67Hutterville Hutterian Brethren InStratford, SD 57474$287,148
68M & R Rausch Farm PtnGettysburg, SD 57442$287,093
69Bon Homme Hutterian Brethren IncTabor, SD 57063$287,008
70Wagners IncRoslyn, SD 57261$286,859
71Edk FarmsMurdo, SD 57559$285,804
72Alan J GrossBlunt, SD 57522$284,824
73Angela K GrossBlunt, SD 57522$284,808
74Heine PartnershipVermillion, SD 57069$284,526
75William James HuberParmelee, SD 57566$284,402
76Hansmeier & Son IncBristol, SD 57219$284,382
77Fordham Hutterian Brethren IncCarpenter, SD 57322$282,881
78Hyde BrosOnida, SD 57564$282,481
79Prairie River Farm IncWatertown, SD 57201$282,012
80Spring Creek Hutterian Brethren IncForbes, ND 58439$281,305

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag