Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 389
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in South Dakota totaled $4,782,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Sam Schauer | Leola, SD 57456 | $7,944 |
82 | Gary J Schauer | Leola, SD 57456 | $7,944 |
83 | Karen Ann Huber | Mission Hill, SD 57046 | $7,723 |
84 | Jon Glen Bietz | Tripp, SD 57376 | $7,592 |
85 | Douglas D Dahl | Wall, SD 57790 | $7,581 |
86 | Scott Crowser | Whitewood, SD 57793 | $7,529 |
87 | Todd Rosencranz | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $7,431 |
88 | Douglas Lehr | Menno, SD 57045 | $7,271 |
89 | Dale Lehr | Menno, SD 57045 | $7,271 |
90 | Stacy Pudwill | Herreid, SD 57632 | $7,271 |
91 | 3 X Ranch LLC | Buffalo, SD 57720 | $7,057 |
92 | Tony Penner | Newell, SD 57760 | $6,946 |
93 | Mark C Reinhard | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $6,832 |
94 | Steven W Pekron | Milesville, SD 57553 | $6,796 |
95 | Charles Enders | Kadoka, SD 57543 | $6,773 |
96 | Merle Leibel | Glencross, SD 57630 | $6,733 |
97 | H & K Ranch Inc | Wall, SD 57790 | $6,720 |
98 | Behrens Ranch Limited Liability Co | Hermosa, SD 57744 | $6,667 |
99 | Travis J Steele | Newell, SD 57760 | $6,654 |
100 | Tipton Mccoy Marshall | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $6,535 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”