Market Gains in South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 9,558
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in South Dakota totaled $189,376,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Ralph J Marquardt | Yankton, SD 57078 | $179,316 |
102 | Bison Bison Inc | Midland, SD 57552 | $177,591 |
103 | Reed Alan Intermill | Volga, SD 57071 | $177,469 |
104 | Mark F Schilling | Clear Lake, SD 57226 | $174,311 |
105 | Krause Allbee Farms Inc | Mansfield, SD 57460 | $173,942 |
106 | Harold Rinehart | Bridgewater, SD 57319 | $173,231 |
107 | K H Inc | Roscoe, SD 57471 | $172,830 |
108 | Bradley Jongeling | Estelline, SD 57234 | $169,451 |
109 | Wendell Duncan Falk | South Shore, SD 57263 | $169,259 |
110 | Eldean Oneal Lykken | Alcester, SD 57001 | $169,077 |
111 | Elizabeth Johanna Lykken | Alcester, SD 57001 | $169,077 |
112 | Davis & Davis | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $168,699 |
113 | Vincent J Gabrielson | Madison, SD 57042 | $168,345 |
114 | Clements Farms | Miller, SD 57362 | $167,255 |
115 | William James Huber | Parmelee, SD 57566 | $166,148 |
116 | Grand Valley Hutterian Brethren Inc | Forbes, ND 58439 | $165,673 |
117 | C Jones Family Farm Inc | Hartford, SD 57033 | $165,444 |
118 | James Dean Wehde | Sioux Falls, SD 57104 | $164,663 |
119 | Gregory Van Zanten | Colton, SD 57018 | $164,648 |
120 | Robert Richter | Madison, SD 57042 | $162,951 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”