Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 14,779
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in South Dakota totaled $82,868,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Donald Scott Dejong | Huron, SD 57350 | $47,140 |
122 | Kelly W Owen | Stockholm, SD 57264 | $47,072 |
123 | Frank Volmer | Winner, SD 57580 | $46,879 |
124 | Donna Volmer | Winner, SD 57580 | $46,816 |
125 | Ch Skip Rau | Selby, SD 57472 | $46,807 |
126 | Mckitrick Ranch Inc | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $46,789 |
127 | Bly Bros | Valley Springs, SD 57068 | $46,620 |
128 | Kubal Cattle Company Inc | Scotland, SD 57059 | $46,181 |
129 | Travis W Goings | Pine Ridge, SD 57770 | $46,173 |
130 | Dale Faulhaber | Groton, SD 57445 | $46,135 |
131 | Steffen Farms LLC | Burke, SD 57523 | $45,990 |
132 | Vilhauer Ranch Inc | Leola, SD 57456 | $45,861 |
133 | Aesoph Farms LLC | Highmore, SD 57345 | $45,406 |
134 | Calhoon Ranch Inc | Ideal, SD 57541 | $45,179 |
135 | Chauncey Ranch LLC | Carter, SD 57580 | $45,171 |
136 | Brian R Kraus | Reliance, SD 57569 | $45,089 |
137 | Todd Olinger | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $45,045 |
138 | Henry Vansloten | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $45,014 |
139 | Union Valley Inc | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $45,014 |
140 | Scott Flannery | Mission, SD 57555 | $44,879 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”