Market Gains in South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 9,558
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in South Dakota totaled $189,376,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Fred M Janke | Madison, SD 57042 | $160,993 |
122 | Terry Ray Balvin | Tyndall, SD 57066 | $160,682 |
123 | Thomas Paul Lebrun | Colman, SD 57017 | $160,501 |
124 | Gary Bernard Hearnen | Conde, SD 57434 | $159,111 |
125 | Gregory Gene Plamp | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $158,965 |
126 | Douglas Howard Jones | Alpena, SD 57312 | $157,868 |
127 | Kevin Hofer | Onida, SD 57564 | $157,546 |
128 | Hillside Hutterian Brethren | Doland, SD 57436 | $157,065 |
129 | Clearfield Hutterian Brethren Inc | Delmont, SD 57330 | $156,327 |
130 | Dewain Joseph Waletich Jr | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $155,148 |
131 | Heesch Farms | New Effington, SD 57255 | $153,723 |
132 | Bert J Rogness | Astoria, SD 57213 | $153,624 |
133 | Kretschmar Farms | Cresbard, SD 57435 | $153,378 |
134 | Richard M Bauer | Harrold, SD 57536 | $152,590 |
135 | David W Guthmiller | Scotland, SD 57059 | $152,112 |
136 | Gail & Mary Vanderwerff Living Trust | Armour, SD 57313 | $151,229 |
137 | Timothy Harold Walter | Watertown, SD 57201 | $150,945 |
138 | Janet Marie Wik | Faulkton, SD 57438 | $150,315 |
139 | Ronald Gene Bird | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $150,194 |
140 | M & R Rausch Farm Ptn | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $150,194 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”