Conservation Reserve Program in South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 13,755
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in South Dakota totaled $102,576,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Roy Bushby Irrevocable Real Estate Trust | Kulm, ND 58456 | $47,362 |
162 | Charles F Blain | Fedora, SD 57337 | $47,282 |
163 | Jesse Lee Morehouse | Andover, SD 57422 | $47,142 |
164 | Kenneth M Jones Jr | Langford, SD 57454 | $47,114 |
165 | Newport Hutterian Brethren Inc | Claremont, SD 57432 | $47,096 |
166 | Doris Jean Beck | Britton, SD 57430 | $47,080 |
167 | Daniel W Olson | Houghton, SD 57449 | $47,051 |
168 | Steven James Hemmer | Colman, SD 57017 | $46,994 |
169 | Douglas Adams Dba A & A Farms | Ethan, SD 57334 | $46,988 |
170 | Cedar Breaks Ranch Llp | Brookings, SD 57006 | $46,963 |
171 | Reiersons Incorporated | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $46,950 |
172 | Scott Phillips | Lake City, SD 57247 | $46,903 |
173 | Jean Phillips | Lake City, SD 57247 | $46,903 |
174 | Charles D Weber | Fulton, SD 57340 | $46,886 |
175 | Peter Herman Leiferman | Brookings, SD 57006 | $46,881 |
176 | Stroschein Family Limited Partnership | Mansfield, SD 57460 | $46,836 |
177 | Fodness Family Ptnr | Sioux Falls, SD 57106 | $46,795 |
178 | Connie Roth | Fulton, SD 57340 | $46,746 |
179 | Schuetzle Farms Inc | Herreid, SD 57632 | $46,666 |
180 | Thomas A Dokken | Webster, SD 57274 | $46,664 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”