Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 13,362
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in South Dakota totaled $179,867,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Jerylin J Dahlman | Faith, SD 57626 | $105,362 |
162 | K Lazy K Ranch Inc | Highmore, SD 57345 | $105,062 |
163 | , | $104,441 | |
164 | Mark Dahlberg | Beresford, SD 57004 | $103,480 |
165 | Eric J Iversen | White River, SD 57579 | $102,849 |
166 | W L Thompson Ranch Partnership | Pierre, SD 57501 | $102,820 |
167 | Spencer Olson | Clear Lake, SD 57226 | $102,507 |
168 | Dustin D Schmidt | White River, SD 57579 | $102,282 |
169 | Trask Ranch Partnership | Wasta, SD 57791 | $102,161 |
170 | Taylor Snook | Hulett, WY 82720 | $102,047 |
171 | Martin L Jones | Mission, SD 57555 | $101,979 |
172 | Scott Peterson Dba Jumpoff Buffalo Ranch LLC | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $101,974 |
173 | Andrew Beld | Hazel, SD 57242 | $101,956 |
174 | , | $101,830 | |
175 | Hs Kennedy Ranch | Philip, SD 57567 | $101,404 |
176 | Gilbert Cattle Company | Ludlow, SD 57755 | $101,356 |
177 | Robert C Ellsworth | Fort Thompson, SD 57339 | $101,132 |
178 | Reimann Ranch LLC | Miller, SD 57362 | $100,855 |
179 | Keith Carmichael | Meadow, SD 57644 | $100,682 |
180 | Daniel A Valburg | White River, SD 57579 | $100,283 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”