Grasslands Reserve Program in South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 139
Recipients of Grasslands Reserve Program from farms in South Dakota totaled $14,553,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Grasslands Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lois Hall Land Limited Partnership | Midland, SD 57552 | $1,125,464 |
2 | Drummond-foster Partners Ltd | Anson, TX 79501 | $1,077,631 |
3 | Clinton L Caldwell | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $892,750 |
4 | Yackley Partnership | Onida, SD 57564 | $802,636 |
5 | Richard Clark Bosworth & Rose Mar | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $525,836 |
6 | Larry Mcquistion | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $487,649 |
7 | Daniel H O'brien | Hermosa, SD 57744 | $469,050 |
8 | Mortenson Family Land Ltd | Hayes, SD 57537 | $389,940 |
9 | Melvin L Gimbel | Ree Heights, SD 57371 | $371,913 |
10 | James Headley | White Lake, SD 57383 | $371,069 |
11 | Fromm Property Holdings Lllp | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $357,335 |
12 | Jeffrey Messmer | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $303,752 |
13 | Philip Carley | Milesville, SD 57553 | $284,811 |
14 | Alan W Bjorkman | Burlington, WI 53105 | $257,532 |
15 | Delbert Woodward | Dupree, SD 57623 | $240,716 |
16 | Dale H Robinson | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $215,730 |
17 | Gary Petik | Brookings, SD 57006 | $208,348 |
18 | Lyle Perman | Lowry, SD 57472 | $204,995 |
19 | Bruce Schilder | Faulkton, SD 57438 | $203,600 |
20 | Doranna D Schmitz-garrity | Hayes, SD 57537 | $200,640 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>