Farm Subsidy information
South Dakota
Total Subsidies in South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 36,090
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in South Dakota totaled $1,280,000,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Matzen Partnership | Onida, SD 57564 | $470,824 |
22 | Dakota Layers LLC | Flandreau, SD 57028 | $469,216 |
23 | Three B Farms Partnership | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $448,808 |
24 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $448,338 |
25 | Lazy Tv Ranch | Selby, SD 57472 | $447,943 |
26 | Mcdonnell's Farm | Quinn, SD 57775 | $434,682 |
27 | Millbrook Hutterian Brethren Inc | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $418,738 |
28 | Lubbers Farm Inc | Gregory, SD 57533 | $414,414 |
29 | Sisseton-wahpeton Oyate | Agency Village, SD 57262 | $407,985 |
30 | Mayclin Farms Partnership | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $407,175 |
31 | Harrell Bros | Miller, SD 57362 | $403,450 |
32 | Mooody County Dairy Limited Partnership | Sioux Falls, SD 57106 | $401,242 |
33 | Cuz | Platte, SD 57369 | $391,991 |
34 | Swenson Partnership | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $390,485 |
35 | Bochek Stock Farms | Vienna, SD 57271 | $379,921 |
36 | Camridge Hutterian Brethren Inc | Volga, SD 57071 | $375,479 |
37 | Lower Brule Farm Corp | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $355,393 |
38 | Oberlander Farms | New Underwood, SD 57761 | $355,376 |
39 | Jorgensen Land & Cattle Part | Ideal, SD 57541 | $349,215 |
40 | Oaklane Hutterian Brethren | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $345,396 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”