Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 4,760
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in South Dakota totaled $21,056,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ajb Partnership | Roscoe, SD 57471 | $248,432 |
2 | Aman Brothers | Hosmer, SD 57448 | $131,536 |
3 | Deerfield Hutt Bret Inc | Ipswich, SD 57451 | $125,000 |
4 | Pembrook Hutt Brethren | Ipswich, SD 57451 | $125,000 |
5 | Plainview Hutterian Brethren Inc | Leola, SD 57456 | $125,000 |
6 | Greg's Farms Inc | Roscoe, SD 57471 | $115,979 |
7 | Norbert A Hoerner | Bowdle, SD 57428 | $109,321 |
8 | Lindskov Ranch Gen Ptr | Isabel, SD 57633 | $109,200 |
9 | C&c Olson Farm Partnership | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $109,192 |
10 | Haar Farms Inc | Onaka, SD 57466 | $107,476 |
11 | Michael G Petersen | Cresbard, SD 57435 | $107,243 |
12 | Aman Farms LLC | Hosmer, SD 57448 | $107,184 |
13 | G & K Farms Inc | Roscoe, SD 57471 | $107,169 |
14 | David Palmer | Mina, SD 57451 | $106,315 |
15 | Jorgensen Land & Cattle Part | Ideal, SD 57541 | $104,253 |
16 | Bto Farms Inc | Eureka, SD 57437 | $100,946 |
17 | Rosette Hutterian Brethren Inc | Leola, SD 57456 | $100,800 |
18 | Shawn Nehlich | Ipswich, SD 57451 | $99,320 |
19 | J & N Haefner Inc | Mound City, SD 57646 | $97,598 |
20 | Schurr Farms Inc | Roscoe, SD 57471 | $90,803 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>