Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 23,896
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in South Dakota totaled $962,244,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Erickson Grain | Platte, SD 57369 | $525,728 |
62 | Lower Brule Farm Corp | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $523,148 |
63 | Riverside Hutterian Brethren Inc | Huron, SD 57350 | $516,911 |
64 | Hillside Hutterian Brethren | Doland, SD 57436 | $515,951 |
65 | Karlen Ranch | Reliance, SD 57569 | $515,557 |
66 | Jamesville Hutterian Brethren Inc | Utica, SD 57067 | $506,057 |
67 | Spink Hutterian Inc | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $505,849 |
68 | Fordham Hutterian Brethren Inc | Carpenter, SD 57322 | $503,527 |
69 | Old Elm Spring Hutterian Brethren | Parkston, SD 57366 | $498,792 |
70 | Mike Ogan Farms Partnership | Pierre, SD 57501 | $497,174 |
71 | Bertsch Ranch | Miller, SD 57362 | $496,898 |
72 | Deerfield Hutt Bret Inc | Ipswich, SD 57451 | $495,779 |
73 | Renelt Brothers Farms | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $494,595 |
74 | Enger Farms | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $494,302 |
75 | Olinger Farms Partnership | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $488,379 |
76 | Kyle Gross | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $488,263 |
77 | Roe Farms Jtv | Harrold, SD 57536 | $482,839 |
78 | Racota Valley Ranch | Hazel, SD 57242 | $481,038 |
79 | Millerdale Hutterian Brethren Inc | Miller, SD 57362 | $475,672 |
80 | Newport Hutterian Brethren Inc | Claremont, SD 57432 | $475,429 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”