Market Loss Assistance Program in South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 43,607
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in South Dakota totaled $547,648,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Rex & Leann Haskins Joint Venture | Pierre, SD 57501 | $279,771 |
22 | Kinkler Farm Partnership | Onida, SD 57564 | $277,411 |
23 | Kuecker Bros | Webster, SD 57274 | $276,782 |
24 | Wittler Joint Venture | Onida, SD 57564 | $273,851 |
25 | Clements Farms | Miller, SD 57362 | $268,178 |
26 | Matzen Partnership | Onida, SD 57564 | $268,062 |
27 | Mundt Brothers | Agar, SD 57520 | $257,840 |
28 | Ferguson Farms | Witten, SD 57584 | $255,172 |
29 | Oberlander Farms | New Underwood, SD 57761 | $238,578 |
30 | Buhler & Buhler Enterprises | Onida, SD 57564 | $237,480 |
31 | Swenson Partnership | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $237,192 |
32 | Odom & Odom | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $229,662 |
33 | Bixler Land | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $227,791 |
34 | Swenson Brothers | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $226,824 |
35 | Armstrong Farms | Pierre, SD 57501 | $225,168 |
36 | M & R Rausch Farm Ptn | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $220,870 |
37 | Schurrs | Roscoe, SD 57471 | $207,758 |
38 | Deadwood Trail Ranch | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $207,588 |
39 | Ireland Brothers | Martin, SD 57551 | $207,144 |
40 | Buckles Ranch | Martin, SD 57551 | $205,360 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”