Total Commodity Programs in South Dakota, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 85,466

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in South Dakota totaled $9,125,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
41Platte Hutterian Brethren IncPlatte, SD 57369$3,946,402
42Hexad FarmsParker, SD 57053$3,904,419
43Spink Hutterian IncFrankfort, SD 57440$3,888,259
44Jamesville Hutterian Brethren IncUtica, SD 57067$3,833,397
45Foxley BrothersPlatte, SD 57369$3,818,078
46Kroeplin Farms General PartnershipHighmore, SD 57345$3,812,023
47Rolland Hutterian Brethren IncWhite, SD 57276$3,779,473
48Braun Joint VentureWarner, SD 57479$3,766,700
49Spring Valley Hutterian Brethren IncWessington Springs, SD 57382$3,765,729
50Karlen RanchReliance, SD 57569$3,755,125
51Rosedale Hutterian Brethren IncorMitchell, SD 57301$3,748,234
52Evergreen ColonyFaulkton, SD 57438$3,733,903
53Berbos FarmsPort Charlotte, FL 33948$3,715,746
54Fulton Ranch IncMiller, SD 57362$3,706,703
55Hillside Hutterian BrethrenDoland, SD 57436$3,683,416
56Pembrook Hutt BrethrenIpswich, SD 57451$3,668,241
57Sylte FarmsIpswich, SD 57451$3,661,070
58Racota Valley RanchHazel, SD 57242$3,631,305
59Millerdale Hutterian Brethren IncMiller, SD 57362$3,599,295
60Diamond Ring FarmMidland, SD 57552$3,567,010

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag