Farm Subsidy information
Aurora County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Aurora County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 513
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Aurora County, South Dakota totaled $25,212,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mark Allen Meier | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $88,067 |
22 | Wieczorek Cattle LLC | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $87,866 |
23 | Jess A Wieczorek | Stickney, SD 57375 | $84,777 |
24 | Reid Daniel Suelflow | White Lake, SD 57383 | $84,384 |
25 | Robert Bruns | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $78,087 |
26 | Vernon Lee Niles | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $75,918 |
27 | Randall Mcqueen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $74,685 |
28 | David Reinesch | White Lake, SD 57383 | $72,236 |
29 | Tyler G Kroupa | White Lake, SD 57383 | $70,730 |
30 | Michael Edward Konechne | White Lake, SD 57383 | $70,036 |
31 | Robert Mohnen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $68,239 |
32 | Andrew Scott | Letcher, SD 57359 | $67,979 |
33 | Richard Clark & Rose Marie Bosworth Revocable Livi | Sioux Falls, SD 57106 | $67,348 |
34 | Eric Joseph Bosworth | White Lake, SD 57383 | $67,209 |
35 | Daniel W Bosworth | White Lake, SD 57383 | $67,209 |
36 | Ronald L Glissendorf | White Lake, SD 57383 | $66,771 |
37 | Mark Hanten | White Lake, SD 57383 | $66,588 |
38 | Douglas Vangorp | Stickney, SD 57375 | $66,074 |
39 | Philip Edward Schmidt | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $63,717 |
40 | Louise Ann Gillen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $59,534 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”