Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Aurora County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 285
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Aurora County, South Dakota totaled $8,163,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Scott Moeller | White Lake, SD 57383 | $27,969 |
82 | David Glen Hargens | Stickney, SD 57375 | $27,739 |
83 | Paul Eugene Matzner | Stickney, SD 57375 | $27,345 |
84 | Ronnie Prien | Stickney, SD 57375 | $27,089 |
85 | Norvil Dykstra | Stickney, SD 57375 | $26,719 |
86 | Ronald Wayne Steffen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $26,610 |
87 | Eric Hanks | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $25,992 |
88 | Jaylon Ralph Gerlach | Stickney, SD 57375 | $25,873 |
89 | Matthew John Mohnen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $25,593 |
90 | David E Bogenhagen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $25,152 |
91 | Dane Rihanek | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $24,623 |
92 | Jamie Lee Heidinger | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $24,488 |
93 | David Johnson | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $24,276 |
94 | Ronald William Assmus | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $24,193 |
95 | Dave Beckmann | White Lake, SD 57383 | $24,064 |
96 | Michael Lee Hargens | Stickney, SD 57375 | $23,610 |
97 | Gerald G Wulf | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $23,241 |
98 | Todd Prangley | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $22,600 |
99 | Curtis James Plamp | Stickney, SD 57375 | $22,206 |
100 | Steve Vangorp | Stickney, SD 57375 | $22,110 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”