Deficiency Payment in Aurora County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 550
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Aurora County, South Dakota totaled $1,611,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Delayne Persson | Corsica, SD 57328 | $5,874 |
82 | Robert Klein | Stickney, SD 57375 | $5,871 |
83 | Larry Wieczorek | Corsica, SD 57328 | $5,857 |
84 | Lynn Alden Anderson | Letcher, SD 57359 | $5,803 |
85 | Dan A Schumacher | Stickney, SD 57375 | $5,618 |
86 | Luray A Asbenson | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $5,611 |
87 | David Johnson | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $5,585 |
88 | Richard Mcqueen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $5,530 |
89 | David Artz | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $5,525 |
90 | Merlin Konechne | White Lake, SD 57383 | $5,445 |
91 | Darrell Espedal | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $5,421 |
92 | Alvin Feenstra | Stickney, SD 57375 | $5,419 |
93 | Philip Edward Schmidt | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $5,410 |
94 | Elmer Bogenhagen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $5,314 |
95 | Donald E Salmen | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $5,308 |
96 | Norbert Lamont Mohnen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $5,221 |
97 | David Michael Gillen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $5,188 |
98 | Roger Hanten | White Lake, SD 57383 | $5,125 |
99 | Chet Edinger | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $5,111 |
100 | Douglas Vangorp | Stickney, SD 57375 | $5,062 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”