Total Commodity Programs in Aurora County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,317
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Aurora County, South Dakota totaled $105,155,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Thomas Pavlin | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $321,122 |
82 | Philip Edward Schmidt | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $315,126 |
83 | Allen E Bosworth | White Lake, SD 57383 | $310,106 |
84 | Gregory Alan Bruinsma | Stickney, SD 57375 | $309,833 |
85 | Swenson Brothers | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $309,145 |
86 | Dale Hoffman | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $308,441 |
87 | Brian Koch | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $306,692 |
88 | Curtis Alden Niewenhuis | Stickney, SD 57375 | $305,011 |
89 | Michael Lee Hargens | Stickney, SD 57375 | $298,295 |
90 | James Guenthner | Stickney, SD 57375 | $296,998 |
91 | Jeffery John Sauvage | Stickney, SD 57375 | $294,225 |
92 | Mark Hanten | White Lake, SD 57383 | $293,173 |
93 | Carol Margaret Gillen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $292,228 |
94 | Vernon Charles Heidinger | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $292,201 |
95 | William G Folan | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $284,713 |
96 | Rodney Kent Glissendorf | White Lake, SD 57383 | $284,589 |
97 | Marion Hargens | Stickney, SD 57375 | $283,129 |
98 | Everett Doering | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $279,910 |
99 | David Reinesch | White Lake, SD 57383 | $278,941 |
100 | Jolene Marie Baker | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $276,104 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”